…I am trying to figure out why the Magpie plugin for EE is not working with some regex in the sidebar. I’m trying to get the domain name to appear below the link, and while the regex was easy enough to write, Magpie + preg_replace is not working within the {items} loop.
Strange.
Update: I fixed this!
Via Transportation Nation — A [new to you] poll from Quinnipiac University puts bike lane support (by registered voters) in New York at 54%, though the cross tabs by party affiliation are interesting. Republicans are less likely to support bike lanes (35% for vs. 59% against), where Democrats and Independents are more likely (59% and 56% respectively).
It also seems there’s a inverse correlation between age and bike lane support — roughly 60% of voters under 49 support bike lanes. Voters over 50 don’t like ‘em so much.
What I wish were on the poll: bike lane support by household income and car ownership.
In the 1920s, when George Mallory was asked why he wanted to climb Mount Everest, he replied with what have become the three most famous words in mountaineering: “Because it’s there.”
I’m sure these guys were thinking the same thing.
John Cassidy for the New Yorker online:
Take Fourth Avenue in Gowanus, a thoroughfare that abuts the sacred Slope but which is itself still largely a commercial route. When I drive up and down Fourth Avenue, as I do often, what I usually see are cars and trucks inching along in single file (it’s a two-way street) with an empty bike lane next to them.
I’m not sure what 4th Avenue John Cassidy drives down: there’s no bike lane, and it’s a 3 lane road in both directions. Maybe the fact checkers don’t do the web?
A “treatment” for an essay I got the inspiration to write the other day after nearly throwing my radio out the window:
Something about the way Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his new book, Eating Animals makes me want to buy a copy just to burn it.
Let’s get two things out, right now.
I’m a vegetarian.
I haven’t read the book and don’t know if I even want to.
I have, however, heard Foer in a couple of interviews, and he comes off (and this is to someone who hasn’t eaten meat in some time) as holier than thou. He repeatedly talks about the hidden costs (economic, environmental, moral, etc.) of eating meat, but misses the bigger point.
People who argue for vegetarianism the way Foer does make me want to fry up a big batch of bacon in my skillet and then fling cold bacon grease at them (no one needs to get hurt).
The moral/ethical argument against eating meat, at least in America, is ultimately a bourgeois one and isn’t effective.
The overwhelming majority of Americans eat meat, and aren’t going to respond well to being chided by the hipster author of the moment.
Ellen DeGeneres (yes, that Ellen), herself a vegan (no animal byproducts at all) raised the $64,000 question during her interview with Foer:
I think one thing is … people are having hard times feeding their families. So if you can go get a burger for a dollar, if you can feed your kids and if it’s affordable and if it’s readily available, they’ll say that it may not be possible, they can’t afford to eat another way. cite
Foer responded with a bunch of drivel about the externalized costs of eating meat.
I’ll grant Foer’s point about the externalities of eating meat. But this isn’t how we’re going to change how America eats and thinks about food.
The food economy in the U.S. largely isn’t a result of personal choice, but public policy that incentivizes factory farms at worst, and discourages smaller family farms at best.
In The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan addresses this. He specifically points to farm subsidies and the (disastrous in his view) effects they have on our diet and food choices.
Let’s incentivize eating vegetables and provide disincentives to factory farms who artificially reduce the price of meat.
You might call it a “carrot and steak” approach.